Posted by Kevin Brady on Wed 30th August 2006 at 09:00 AM, Filed in Project Management

STAGE 4 - Start your Timebox Challenge meeting

image

(a) Get your team in a room with a projector / Microsoft Project and three white boards:–

Board 1 – Headed Risks & Issues
Board 2 – Headed Prerequisite Constraints
Board 3 – Headed Assumptions

Make sure that everyone involved in the product deliverable is present.

Read more...

| Del.icio.us | | Digg this | | Comments (0) | | Email to a friend
Posted by Kevin Brady on Mon 28th August 2006 at 09:00 AM, Filed in Project Management

STAGE 2 – Developing a stakeholder project team.

Firstly, you need to change your company’s HR salary review and career development policies in order to make everyone on the project team a stakeholder and not just a salaried employee.

image

I have, more times than I can remember, convened departmental meetings with all staff present and told them that the game has changed :-

Read more...

| Del.icio.us | | Digg this | | Comments (2) | | Email to a friend
Posted by Kevin Brady on Thu 24th August 2006 at 09:46 AM, Filed in Project Management

What is Timeboxing?

For those newbie’s to IT Project Management, Time boxing is where a group of tasks are given a fixed period of time to be completed. Time Boxing is often used in project management, not just to set the delivery goals for small groups of tasks, but rightly or wrongly to set the delivery date for entire projects /programmes of work.

image

Different Timeboxing techniques

“Top-Down” Timeboxing

The “Top Down” setting of a Timebox is where management dictates what product is produced - where, how, when and with what resource. 

“Top Down” is often used at project level by sponsors /clients wanting to set a delivery date for a project of specified scope /quality /cost.
Usually no attempt is made to discover whether such a project is feasible other than a “gestimate” by the senior management and sponsor. At project level I have never seen a top down timebox plan work to time without significant stripping out of scope and quality. Often the descoping has been so aggressive that very often the IT system delivered has failed to remotely achieve its original business case objectives.

Read more...

| Del.icio.us | | Digg this | | Comments (1) | | Email to a friend
Posted by Kevin Brady on Mon 21st August 2006 at 01:00 PM, Filed in Project /Programme Failures

Some weeks ago I published a post entitled - Management Consultants Friends or Foe where I reported on an article I had read in the Daily Mail.  In it Dr Paul Miller, leader of Britain’s hospitital doctors (Chairman of the British Medical Association Consultants Committee), mocked Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt’s recent boast that the HNS has had its best year ever. “How deluded can one get?”

The core of the article was the fact that the NHS was spending some £1 billion on Management Consultants last year, and the NHS was getting precious little for this money in terms of efficiency savings /fully functioning IT systems.

Read more...

| Del.icio.us | | Digg this | | Comments (1) | | Email to a friend
Posted by Kevin Brady on Thu 17th August 2006 at 03:10 PM, Filed in Key ArticlesSoftware Dev Methodologies

I promise in the next few weeks to concentrate on other subjects other than AGILE and its deficiencies, but my readership statistics show that AGILE is a popular subject. I also feel I have to keep up with my protagonists comments, which are appearing not just on my blog but all over the net.

image

At the moment, the net is buzzing with AGILE evangelist websites and Blogs making statements like “the AGILE manifesto is the equivalent to Newton 4th Law of Motion”. When someone takes a fanatical belief in anything without proper empirical evidence you have got to start thinking!!. Please see my post Storm in a Tea Cup. I really think these evangelists do not expect us to engage our brains. They think if they keep repeating the common look-up list of humorous slogans about AGILE’s invincibility, we will all be conditioned into turning a blind eye to the detail and asking for verifiable and independent evidence concerning this approach’s claimed scalability and prowess over other methods /approaches. At the moment the whole IT methods industry from Waterfall to RUP to AGILE and SCRUM is in need of consolidation based on some sound independent research. As we speak, large corporations take huge “flip flop” financial gambles adopting this method over another, largely based on the word of lightweight fee-earning consultants.

Read more...

| Del.icio.us | | Digg this | | | | Email to a friend
Page 1 of 3 pages Next Page

 1 2 3 >